NANOG Evolution—What's Next?



<Updated 10/12/05>

Many thanks to the folks in the community who've been working hard to help NANOG change and improve. We value your input—keep an eye on this page to track our progress.

  • 09/29/05—2005 PC selection process announced..

  • 08/27/05—members of the first NANOG Steering Committee are announced. See www.nanog.org/results05.html.

  • 06/15/05—NANOG's new charter is based on input from the community and is available at www.nanog.org/charter05.html

  • www.nanog-reform.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/NANOGReform/DraftBylaws
    "NANOG Bylaws," v0.2-SJW-alternate-version, revised 04/13/05.

  • Merit's "Proposed Action Plan for a New NANOG Charter," 05/09/05.

  • Email sent to the nanog-announce and nanog-futures lists by Merit's Interim President,
    Mike McPherson, on 05/09/05:
    
    From mcpherso@umich.edu Mon May  9 16:35:44 2005
    Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 15:34:43 -0400
    From: "McPherson, Michael" 
    To: nanog-futures@nanog.org, nanog-announce@nanog.org
    Cc: nanogpc@nanog.org, Betty Burke ,
         Susan Harris 
    Subject: The evolution of NANOG
    
    For some time there have been extensive discussions, both in person and
    via email, concerning the future of NANOG.  A dedicated group of
    individuals (including many of you) has assembled a detailed proposal
    for NANOG's evolution, a proposal which lays out a number of important
    ideas.  Merit staff are very grateful for the well-informed and
    constructive work put forth by the NANOG community.
    
    We at Merit are in agreement with most of the proposed changes, although
    there are a few points which we feel require further discussion.  In
    this message I would like to outline Merit's reaction to these proposals
    and propose some next steps for discussion via email and at the next
    NANOG meeting in Seattle.  As you will see below, our intention is to
    move forward with these changes over the summer.
    
    The first change you will see is one of financial transparency.
    Beginning with the Seattle meeting, Merit will provide an update on
    NANOG finances and operations at each meeting.  Look for this
    presentation at every future NANOG meeting; it will take place during
    the Sunday Special Community Meeting in Seattle.  Information will also
    be posted on nanog.org.
    
    We support the formation of a Steering Committee which will provide
    overall guidance for NANOG operations, appoint the Program Committee,
    and appoint the mailing list administrator panel.  The Steering
    Committee would consist of six members elected by the NANOG community
    and one appointed by Merit.  We propose that an election process be
    developed and that the first Steering Committee be elected during the
    summer of 2005, to begin serving by the Fall NANOG meeting.
    
    We support the formation of a Program Committee appointed by the
    Steering Committee.  Our experience leads us to believe that a larger
    committee will be better able to handle the heavy workload, so we
    suggest that the Program Committee consist of 16 members  (plus one
    member appointed by Merit).  
    
    A smooth transition from the current committee to a new one is critical
    to ensure the success of upcoming meetings.  We propose that the current
    Program Committee continue as presently constituted through the Fall
    NANOG meeting (except that the three open positions would be filled
    through appointment by the current committee after an open nomination
    process).  This will allow time for the Steering Committee to be elected
    and to appoint a new Program Committee.  
    
    In order to provide continuity and preserve institutional memory of the
    programming process, half (or more, at the discretion of the Steering
    Committee) of the members of the first reconstituted Program Committee
    would be selected from among those current Program Committee members
    willing to continue service, and the remainder would be new appointments
    from the community at large.  We propose that Steve Feldman continue his
    capable leadership as Program Committee chair for the first year to help
    the new committee get established.
    
    We recommend that a member of the Steering Committee serve ex officio on
    the Program Committee, and that the chair of the Program Committee serve
    ex officio on the Steering Committee.  These liaison roles will help
    ensure that the activities of the two groups are coordinated.
    
    We also support the change to mailing list administration, a change
    already partially implemented.  We propose three panel members appointed
    by the Steering Committee and one appointed by Merit.
    
    We seek further discussion on the subject of membership.  We at Merit
    believe that NANOG's success is due in no small part to its informality,
    an informality which mirrors other technical activities related to the
    Internet.  We believe that addition of a paid membership category will
    dilute the influence of those who make the effort and take the time to
    participate in NANOG's main activity, the meetings.  We propose that
    eligibility to vote in NANOG elections be determined solely by
    registration for NANOG meetings.  We look forward to discussing this
    question in Seattle.
    
    Finally, although NANOG is a community of professionals, it is also a
    Merit business activity and not a separate organization.  Merit accepts
    the risks, both financial and otherwise, created by NANOG.  Merit staff
    are responsible first to Merit's Board of Directors for these financial
    and risk issues.  In order to exercise our responsibility to our Board
    we must retain final authority over NANOG operations and finances,
    including representing NANOG to other organizations, negotiating and
    executing agreements with vendors, and selecting hosts and sites.  We do
    not expect this to be a problem in practice, however, as we intend to
    work with the new Steering Committee and Program Committee on the
    presumption that the members of the NANOG community know best what they
    need from NANOG.  We are confident that the goals of community guidance
    and transparency can be achieved without abrogating our responsibility
    to Merit's Board.
    
    You can read a draft of a proposed new NANOG Charter and action plan at
    http://www.nanog.org/evolution.html.  You will also find a link to the
    most recent NANOG-reform draft bylaws document for reference.  We have
    adopted considerable language from that document, into which so much
    effort was put.  We thank those who provided that foundation and have
    participated in the discussion so far, and we encourage everyone to
    participate in the continuing evolution of NANOG.  We are excited about
    moving NANOG into its future.
    
    See you at the NANOG Futures session in Seattle on Tuesday, 17 May.
    
    Mike
    --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
    Michael R. McPherson, Interim President and CEO 
    Merit Network, Inc.                        | mcpherson@merit.edu 
    1000 Oakbrook Dr., Suite 200               | 734-764-9430 
    Ann Arbor, MI  48104-6794                  | FAX: 734-647-3185
      http://www.merit.edu               http://www.umich.edu/~mcpherso
    Scheduling: Gayle Terkeurst, 734-764-8450, gturkey@merit.edu
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------